Follow-up 2 on "I HOPE there is nothing to see here ...
This will be short
[Edit: Added 24 Aug 10:10 —
The figure compares "First Dose, at least 21 days ago" to "Uncaccinated" in the .XLS file referencetable06072022accessible downloaded from the ONS Website -- see footnote 1.]
I did what I said I might do and looked at the ratio of the “All-Cause-Mortality-Rate” of Vax’d to Un-Vax’d for the ONS Datafor the past 17 month. The results are shown in the very beautiful plot below:
Figure 1. No, this is not an abstract modern-art picture I stole from a Museum, but perhaps I should try to sell it as an NFT? The plot shows the ratio of the All-Cause-Mortality-Rate of Vax’d/Un-Vax’d for people in the U.K. over the last 17 months. Open-Source LibreOffice Calc picked the colors. I chose the Font Size and Formatting!
Of course, one might just say that you can’t trust ANY numbers from ANY government. While I certainly don’t trust any numbers in Official Proclamations from governments (or Big Pharma) re CoVid-1984, the Climate Apocalypse, the Economy, or anything else, it could be that there are competent people in government agencies that tabulate believable DATA and publish them in non-official-proclamation form.
Steve Kirsch has found reason to believe [some portions of] the ONS data are unreliable.
I, of course, only looked at All-Cause-Mortality because I certainly don’t trust anyone’s numbers on “CoVid-Deaths”, and neither should you.
There are a number of tests one might do to test the quality of different portions of these ONS data, and I haven’t done any of them. In Steve Kirsch’s words (which I think he stole from someone else), it could all be GIGO (Garbage-In Garbage-out).
Thanks for reading Dr. TimE., Apostate! Subscribe for FREE to receive new posts which I’m sure Google will send to your SPAM folder. But first STOP and THINK! Do you REALLY want to encourage me?
Note: all edits are shown in [italics] with square brackets.
The latest dataset from the ONS is titled ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status, England, 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2022‘, and it can be accessed on the ONS site here, and downloaded here.
I put the following as a comment to Steve in his article:
I'd like to be able to say, "DATA Rules" or "DATA Rocks",
but I think the reality is that "Group Think Rules".
Most people just won't even look at your DATA and just write you off as a Conspiracy Theorist.
Perhaps, since you like doing Surveys, do a Survey of all your subscribers, and ask the questions like:
Am I just Preaching to the Choir?
How many of you are here because my writings changed your mind?
How many of you were at one time a Believer, but started questioning ? (i.e., became a Heretic or Apostate)?
i.e., questions that will prove that it is hopeless to fight a Narrative.
Or, maybe ask a useful question:
If you were once a Believer, but are not now, WHAT caused you to begin questioning ? Please be specific.
Maybe there is something there, something in common with many people -- that would be useful to know.
You'll have to maybe hire an army to analyze such diverse responses!
If I've learned anything from challenging Narratives,
it seems hopeless in the face of Group Think (human nature) and scientific weapons-grade Propaganda.
Any finding about how to successfully attack Group Think would be very useful.
Perhaps there are some psychologists employed by the CIA with insight into this!
Gosh, maybe an mRNA Vax against Propaganda ?
A little sarcasm thrown in there.
I really like the Conclusions that Steve put in his latest:
Steve points out all the Nonsense, and leaves it as a question ...
and then cynically answers his own question.
Of course, who can't be at least a bit cynical about all this nonsense!?