-- Lockdowns have no, and definitely many negative effects;
-- And even Vaxing has no effect;
-- and so too Vax Passports have no effect;
No effect on the spread of CoVid-1984. But, the Experts and Governments persist in things shown to have only negative effects. True insanity, or try psychopathology?
"As Ms. Conrad has detailed, her hospital serves a community in which less than 50% of the individuals were vaccinated for Covid-19 but yet, during the same time period, approximately 90% of the individuals admitted to her hospital were documented to have received this vaccine."
It should also be noted that the "vaccinated" and "unvaccinated" numbers aren't apples to apples because the CDC instructed to lower the CT values from 40 to 28 for the vaccinated. Maybe the same sample is present, or maybe there are many false positives in the unvaccinated category. We may never know.
Yes, using the lower Ct value for the Vaccinated in the U.S. sure doesn't make a very level playing field. Of one thing I ABSOLUTELY agree, "We may never know" about so many things, e.g., the true number of people killed by the "Lock-Downs" and Medical Malpractice for starters.
Exactly. We never did any cost benefit analysis on what one "life saved" was worth relative to the economic and mortality costs that with this "expert" stupidity. Fwiw, it wasn't saying your analysis was wrong. I agree whole heartedly and have done a similar state level analysis for the US and demonstrated zero correlation with respect to vax rates. And if anything, the vaxxed breakthrough infections are underreported due to at home testing now and lowered pcr testing. But we all know the lockdowners can't view and analyze data.
None of the stuff works, plain and simple, so just keep doing MOAR of it!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jzevzs25RQ&t=1s
Yep, just add it to the list. The numbers show:
-- Masking have no, or rather negative effects;
-- Lockdowns have no, and definitely many negative effects;
-- And even Vaxing has no effect;
-- and so too Vax Passports have no effect;
No effect on the spread of CoVid-1984. But, the Experts and Governments persist in things shown to have only negative effects. True insanity, or try psychopathology?
And then there is this report:
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/whistleblower-fda-and-cdc-ignore-3e2?utm
"As Ms. Conrad has detailed, her hospital serves a community in which less than 50% of the individuals were vaccinated for Covid-19 but yet, during the same time period, approximately 90% of the individuals admitted to her hospital were documented to have received this vaccine."
I would like to state my support for your findings but I don't want to be burned as a witch.
It should also be noted that the "vaccinated" and "unvaccinated" numbers aren't apples to apples because the CDC instructed to lower the CT values from 40 to 28 for the vaccinated. Maybe the same sample is present, or maybe there are many false positives in the unvaccinated category. We may never know.
Yes, using the lower Ct value for the Vaccinated in the U.S. sure doesn't make a very level playing field. Of one thing I ABSOLUTELY agree, "We may never know" about so many things, e.g., the true number of people killed by the "Lock-Downs" and Medical Malpractice for starters.
Exactly. We never did any cost benefit analysis on what one "life saved" was worth relative to the economic and mortality costs that with this "expert" stupidity. Fwiw, it wasn't saying your analysis was wrong. I agree whole heartedly and have done a similar state level analysis for the US and demonstrated zero correlation with respect to vax rates. And if anything, the vaxxed breakthrough infections are underreported due to at home testing now and lowered pcr testing. But we all know the lockdowners can't view and analyze data.
Lets Go Brandon!