13 Comments
author

The VAERS system is not meant to accurately count the number deaths or adverse reaction from Vaccines. It is rather an "Early Warning System" to alert the Medical Community if there is a serious problem -- and it is flashing red and the alarms going off!

Expand full comment
author

As I said, I am NOT an M.Deity, so no one should take my medical advice, e.g., "If you have 5 comorbidities you will die". I don't REALLY know that to be true. I looked up the definition of comorbidity and it merely means, "the state of being comorbid". So, it could be that you are just some regular person as I engaging in being morbid ("an attitude, quality, or state of mind marked by excessive gloom") with another.

But, perhaps such a flippant comment as this takes away from the Seriousness of this Posting? Where's are the fucking moderators and censors when you really need them ?!!!

Expand full comment
author

I had a guest "Fact-Checker" for this post.

"Love your calculator.

I object to your references: zero hedge, off guardian, Swiss policy research. You won’t get facts there, sometimes half truths possibly"

Expand full comment

Geez, Tim. You ARE serious. I mean, when I saw the photo of your HP-15C Reverse Polish Entry Notation Scientific Calculator, I got totally verklempt and a little tear formed in my right eye (better than my wrong eye, indeed). I was so overwhelmed with emotion, in fact — especially when you mentioned Texas — that I pulled out my standard Texas Instruments TI-30X♊︎S calculator purchased in 2009 and checked the P-value for my own possible death by CoVid-1984.

As it turns out, there is a 100% confidence level that I will NOT die either by, with, for, under, around, inside, near, or over CoVid-1984, since the so-called virus has never been scientifically isolated, purified, or seen under a microscope. This confidence level surely extends to my half-life, even though I don't know how to calculate that. In light of this factual information, I am officially declaring this so-called virus "CovAin't" and will start publishing my findings in all the respected journals. I wonder how the M.Deities will respond. The prospect is exciting, although I guess since they're getting kickbacks for every positive diagnosis and jab administered, most (read: all) of them will hate my conclusions and call on the fact-checkers to put that warning stamp on my articles and probably on my forehead, too.

I was thinking of using Chi-Squared and Z-Star stats somewhere in my future journal articles, just because they sound so frickin' cool, but I don't remember the formulas or when to use them. Also, I burned my statistics book after I passed the class with an "A" so I'll have to rely on experts who have maintained their ability to use all those nifty formulas. I'm concerned about that, since a lot of "experts" these days seem to be peddling "interesting" numbers and "data sets" while changing definitions of important stuff right before they issue new warnings and new (old) mandates, and place the latest "conspiracy theorist" under the Science®©℗™ Cancel Culture Guillotine.

Anyway, I'm glad to read about your seriousness level ("REALLY" is impressive). Do you have a formula for that? I want to check my seriousness level, too!

Expand full comment