My new friend is Deep Seek — sounds kind of like a Indian name (Deep), combined with my Secret Guru (Seek).
I asked him (her, it, they, whatever) if Cause precedes Effect, and did get an answer1, which seems pretty reasonable.
I then asked the question:
If Cause precedes Effect, and if Temperature precedes C02 in Ice Core and Mud Core Data, then must it not be true that Al Gore is an idiot?
And my New Friend didn’t answer. Oh well. I can always get a new wolf this Spring to be my new New Friend.
I asked my new friend/guru several other questions, and I learned that it will always give me the “Narrative”.
Now, someone told me about Grok3, and I asked it a few questions, and I will say this: it does, to some extent, question the Narrative.
In summary, while the principle that cause precedes effect holds true in classical physics and everyday experience, there are theoretical scenarios in advanced physics where this relationship can become more complex or appear to be violated. Nonetheless, in the macroscopic world and under normal circumstances, cause reliably precedes effect.
I asked Grok about climate and at first got the whole greenhouse gas theory and references to the IPCC fantasies.
Here is what Brave AI said when asked about the relationship between CO2 and temps which is quite funny given the apparent non-sequitur conclusion prompting the question - does this mean the physical relationship between temps and CO2 have been flipped on its head?
"Deviation between Temperature and CO2 Trends in Data
According to the data, during interglacial periods, temperature changes precede CO2 concentration increases by up to 1,000 years. This natural phenomenon helps bring the planet out of ice ages and moderates temperatures. In contrast, during the post-industrial era, the rapid increase in CO2 emissions has preceded the current warming trend."
Grok (unlike Brave) was a more reliable. When challenged with the the challenges of GHG theory etc, Grok did admit the many inconsistencies with these data points and did apologize providing a point by point answer to what was wrong with the mainstream hysteria.
Enjoyed this article by Katie Spence that seems to put the whole debate and climate hysteria in perspective...
https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/fixation-on-co2-ignores-real-driver-of-temperature-say-experts-5588495
Love the humor!