Or, did this little gem somehow get past the Censors1?
And, if so, how long will it stay on YouTube before going down the Memory Hole?
Short (only 4 minute) video by Jørgen Peder Steffensen, a professor of glaciology at the Centre for Ice and Climate at the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen.
View it (and download it) while you can — it’s only 4 minutes long.
Further, to wit, AN ESTIMATE OF THE CENTENNIAL VARIABILITY OF GLOBAL TEMPERATURES. Lloyd PJ. Energy & Environment · Vol. 26, No. 3, 2015.
'The Holocene records up to 8000 years before present, from several ice cores were examined. The differences in temperatures between all records which are approximately a century apart were determined, after any trends in the data had been removed. The differences were close to normally distributed. The average standard deviation of temperature was 0.98 ± 0.27C.'
There are a range of 'names' for the UNFCCC/IPCC/UNEP scam. Take your pick.
Yup.
About 4 years ago I gave a Seminar at I.U. Bloomington regarding my analysis of the Vostock Ice Core DATA and questioning the AGW Narrative.
At the end of my talk, the Department Chairman said, "You rely too much on DATA".
A very nice presentation, thank you.
Further, to wit, AN ESTIMATE OF THE CENTENNIAL VARIABILITY OF GLOBAL TEMPERATURES. Lloyd PJ. Energy & Environment · Vol. 26, No. 3, 2015.
'The Holocene records up to 8000 years before present, from several ice cores were examined. The differences in temperatures between all records which are approximately a century apart were determined, after any trends in the data had been removed. The differences were close to normally distributed. The average standard deviation of temperature was 0.98 ± 0.27C.'
There are a range of 'names' for the UNFCCC/IPCC/UNEP scam. Take your pick.