Have Millions been killed by the mRNA Injections ? Or is it just Coincidence?
No Statistics -- Just DATA -- You decide
Introduction: In a draft of my Ph.D. Physics thesis, I had written:
“These data obviously show …”1 (Those Data DID, I’m sure! Whatever they were.)
Bob Pollock, IUCF Laboratory Director, my thesis advisor, crossed those most-beautiful words out, and scribbled in: “Just show the data; let the reader decide”.
So, below are raw data from official government agencies from four countries for the CoVid-Injection-Rates, and Death or All-Cause-Mortality Rates. The solid curves are the 4 week running averages. No Statistics, no Analysis, and no Conclusions. And these aren’t my Data — I have no skin in the game. Think what you will.
Germany
Canada
U.K.2
U.S.3
Discussion
I “see” a surge in Deaths lagging each surge in Injections by about a month or two for the past almost 2 years. What do you “see”?
If one were to conjecture that this Correlation is not Coincidence, but rather Causation, then one might also conjecture that these Injections have caused the death of at least 1 Million Americans and 20 Million others around the world.
Perhaps if there were anything else indicating the lethality of these Injections? Perhaps the VAERS System?
Philosophical question: can Data (i.e., numbers coming from verifiable measurements, not from models) disprove a Narrative? E.g., didn’t Galileo’s observations of the moons orbiting Jupiter merely confirm the Earth-Centric-Epicycle model and that it just needed a few more refinements (Tweaks)? One could create an infinite number of models to explain these data. This is where one might invoke Occam’s Razor. But perhaps Occam’s Razor only confirms that Physicists tend towards the simplest solution due to their inherent laziness. But perhaps there is something to be said for Simplicity. In Wm. Blake’s words:
“How wide the Gap, Impassible, between Simplicity, and Insipidity?”
We BELIEVE all sorts of things, usually told to us by Authorities. But can we really KNOW anything?
Note: The U.K. Mortality Data is pitifully “noisy”, to the point of being suspect; consequently I show only one plot for the largest surge in Injections. I removed a single obvious outlier in the Mortality Data that deviated by 17 Standard Deviations from the remaining data with respect to its neighbors! That was a first for me. The probability of a point being even just 7 Standard Deviations away is less than 1 part in a billion and I don’t think that even I could even calculate the probability of 17 Standard Deviations! Please excuse this necessary “Statistic”. In the future I may write a whole posting about “Statistics”.
It is interesting to compare the smoothness, or lack of noise, in the U.S. Mortality Data from the CDC, compared with the U.K. Mortality data from the ONS. One might conjecture all sorts of things.
The apparent "lack" of data being put out by governments along with their incessant "correlation does not equal causation" schtick is tiresome. They are hiding something and it doesn't take statistical degrees to know what that is.
I know 1 person who died "from" covid. From in quotes because he was subjected to the "agreed upon treatment" by which all who died "from covid" were subjected. But in the past 2 years I have lost many more than that to "heart attack", cancers, aneurisms, and blood clots with a notable number of suicides where the only common denominator is they got the jab.
May it be entirely coincidental? Sure, it could be, but the very fact that the government is playing either close to the chest or being epically transparent with doctored data while trying to convince everyone to get the jab if they have not yet tells me it is not coincidence. By the government's data, all the unvaxxed should now be deceased or at least suffering from debilitating illness. The reality is I and many others were infected once, gained immunity and went on with life. The only people I know who are suffering long term disability are those who were jabbed and then suffered repeated infections on about a bimonthly basis.
The media may legally be allowed to publish propaganda, aka lie to cover up the truth, but government agencies and employees must be truthful. The CDC is not required to publish a summary or report on data. They're only legally required to compile and record actual data. The media does the lying for the CDC in 'stories' that they publish. The public rarely sees the raw data shown here. Besides, many people cannot analyse the data, or even just observe the obvious in simple graphs, then form their own opinion or come to a conclusion. They need an authority to provide confirmation bias. Of course, independent types do not have this problem. But as we've seen with the numbers of vaxed vs non-vaxed, independent thinkers are a minority.
Then there's the vaxed who cannot bring themselves to admit the horror of it all, that they were conned into getting a time bomb injected into their body. And there's the other vaxed who, no matter what anyone says, no matter how much data they're provided, regardless of loved ones dropping dead all around them, will never allow themselves to see the vax as anything but safe, effective and necessary. And the media is right there, paid by Big Pharma and the Government to support their delusions, to this day with false narratives and stories of how safe and effective the vax is.
Don't get me started on top doctors who go on & on about the virus & variants that don't exist.