6 Comments
User's avatar
Aimee's avatar

It’s really something, isn’t it? Naomi Wolfe said recently that her Alma Mater, Yale, receives more money from HHS than it does from tuition. So there you have it. They are putting cash ahead of the health and well being of their students.

Expand full comment
Tim Ellison's avatar

Yes!

Perhaps it is more the "Follow-the-Money" Religion, rather than the "Follow-the-Science" Religion!

Expand full comment
Michael Suede's avatar

Nice letter. It's been this way for a lot more than just the CoVid fiasco. Since you're a physicist and engineer, you might be able to appreciate this article more than most. I wrote this back in 2011. My points have only grown stronger over the past decade, especially with the new JWST data. https://libertariannews.org/2011/07/08/einstein-was-wrong-2/

Expand full comment
Tim Ellison's avatar

Without spending much time (perhaps yet) on your writings, I'd wager we might be in violent agreement about many things, e.g.:

-- the failed attempt to explain motions of the planets and galaxies using only the force of gravity, while ignoring the electromagnetic force, about 10^36 times stronger. But rather than question the theories, instead "explain" them by introducing "Dark Energy" and "Dark Matter" -- neither of which has been measured. Feeds into your references to the "Electric Universe" folks (Thunderbolt Project).

-- the hottest new field in physics: string theory -- a theory for which no one has even conceived of an experiment to test it.

-- and of course, there is the whole Anthropogenic Global Warming Scam which is all Model and no DATA. I call this the Theory that can Explain Everything but Predict Nothing (correctly).

On the Other-Other hand, you certainly can't discount Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity -- that theory has been so-well tested and used for practical applications (e.g., relativistic particle accelerators) that it might be called a Law rather than a Theory.

Expand full comment
Michael Suede's avatar

Right on man. I do discount SR for the simple fact that it's not a unified theory, nor can it ever be a unified theory. Mills was able to get better predictive values using closed form classical physics in his unified theory. I'm not saying Mills is right about everything, but he's on the right track.

https://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/SummaryTables120418.pdf

Expand full comment
Adam's avatar

I doubt you'll receive any replies but, if you do, I look forward to reading them 😏

Expand full comment